More Changes to Mortgage Qualification on the Horizon?

Katherine Martin • August 8, 2016

Given the current economic environment in Canada, with record levels of household indebtedness and growing risks and vulnerabilities in some housing markets, OSFI’s supervisory scrutiny in the area of mortgage underwriting will continue.” This was included in Reinforcing Prudent Residential Mortgage Risk Management published early July by the Office of the Superintendent of Financial Institutions (OSFI).

The purpose of this nice and tidy piece of government correspondence is to inform the public that OSFI will be upping their game, paying closer attention to mortgage underwriting policies. And although no hard and fast rule changes were announced, an announcement of “hey, we are paying really close attention here” is typically not made unless there has been at least some thought about what the next steps might be (if required).

So let’s take a look at some of the potential changes the government could make to mortgage qualification.

Qualifying All Terms at the Benchmark Rate

As it stands right now, variable rate mortgages and fixed rate mortgages with terms of less than five years are qualified using the benchmark rate. The benchmark rate is set higher than the actual contract rate and is used to “stress test” mortgage applications.

In our current low interest rate environment, many Canadians see the five year fixed mortgage as a good choice simply because it qualifies using the contract rate instead of the benchmark rate. This means using the five year rate, borrowers can qualify for a lot more house compared to a shorter fixed term or variable rate mortgage.

Forcing all mortgages to be qualified at the benchmark rate could be on the horizon and would most likely lessen the appeal of the five year fixed rate.

Increasing the Benchmark Rate

If the goal is to tighten mortgage qualification, a simple way to do that would be to increase the benchmark slowly but surely. The higher the qualifying rate, the less you qualify for. Plain and simple. However as this might have other economic ramifications, we’ll just have to wait and see if this is in the government playbook.

Lower Debt Service Ratios

In order to qualify for a mortgage, you take your principal, interest, taxes, and heat and divide by your annual income, this is called your gross debt service ratio or GDS. When you add your other debt obligations to this calculation, it becomes your total debt service ratio or TDS.

Currently, for insured mortgages in Canada, your maximum GDS is limited to 39% while your TDS is capped at 42%.

A simple tweak to these numbers would have a pretty significant impact.

A Flat 10% Down Payment

If you remember, back in February of 2016, the government increased the minimum down payment amount. When purchasing a property, the first $500,000 requires a minimum of 5% down, whereas the portion of the purchase price above $500,000 now requires a 10% down payment.

Seeing as though the government just made these changes, it doesn’t seem likely that they would scrap them and simply introduce a flat 10% downpayment across the board, but you never know!

Regardless of what future changes are made to mortgage qualifications (if any) to address “our current economic environment”, you can count on us to make sure you are kept in the know.

If you need anything, please contact me, I’d love to hear from you!

 

This article originally appeared in the August 2016 Dominion Lending Centres Newsletter. 

Katherine Martin


Origin Mortgages

Phone: 1-604-454-0843
Email: kmartin@planmymortgage.ca
Fax: 1-604-454-0842


RECENT POSTS

How to Legally Assign a Construction Mortgage

By Katherine Martin • September 23, 2026
Why More Mortgage Options Matter—Especially for Assignment Purchases One of the biggest advantages of working with an independent mortgage professional is access to choice. Instead of being limited to one lender and one set of products, mortgage brokers work with multiple lenders—each with different guidelines, risk tolerances, and mortgage solutions. That flexibility becomes especially valuable when your situation doesn’t fit neatly into a “standard” box. A great example of this is purchasing new construction through an assignment contract . Why Assignment Purchases Can Be Challenging Assignment purchases are often viewed as higher risk by traditional lenders. Rather than declining these deals outright, many lenders quietly make them difficult by adding layers of conditions, restrictions, or uncertainty. This can lead to delays, frustration, or financing falling apart late in the process. The Good News There are lenders—available exclusively through the broker channel —that have clear, favourable policies for assignment purchases. With the right lender and proper planning, these transactions are absolutely doable. Typical Financing Requirements for Assignment Purchases While every situation is unique, many lenders that allow assignment financing look for the following: Standard purchase qualification, including income verification, credit, and down payment Assignments accepted at either the original purchase price or current market value Minimum 620 credit score , with no prior bankruptcies or consumer proposals The full down payment must come from the purchaser —seller incentives cannot be used Required Documentation To secure financing, lenders typically require: The original purchase agreement signed by all parties The MLS listing (if applicable) The assignment agreement signed by the builder, original purchaser, and new buyer Any side agreements outlining changes to the purchase price A full appraisal to confirm value This list isn’t exhaustive, but it highlights that while assignment purchases require more coordination, they are very achievable with the right lender and guidance. Final Thoughts Assignment contracts can open doors to great opportunities—but only if your financing supports the transaction. This is where access to multiple lenders and specialized policies makes a real difference. If you’re considering purchasing new construction through an assignment, or if you’d like to explore more traditional purchase options, feel free to connect anytime. I’d be happy to walk you through the mortgage products available and help you choose an option that doesn’t limit your financing possibilities.

Monthly vs. Biweekly Mortgage Payments: Which Is Better?

By Katherine Martin • September 16, 2026
How Mortgage Payment Frequency Affects What You Pay Over Time You’ve probably heard the saying that there are two certainties in life: death and taxes. When it comes to your mortgage, there’s really just one certainty—you’ll repay what you borrow, plus interest. What is flexible, though, is how often you make your mortgage payments. And that choice can have a meaningful impact on how quickly you pay down your mortgage and how much interest you pay over time. The Six Mortgage Payment Frequencies Most lenders offer the following payment options: Monthly – 12 payments per year Semi-monthly – 24 payments per year Bi-weekly – 26 payments per year Weekly – 52 payments per year Accelerated bi-weekly – 26 payments per year Accelerated weekly – 52 payments per year Standard Payment Frequencies The first four options are designed to align with how you get paid. For example: Paid monthly? Monthly mortgage payments may make sense. Paid every two weeks? Bi-weekly payments can align nicely with your cash flow. With these standard options, regardless of how often you pay, the total amount paid over the year is the same —it’s simply divided into more frequent payments. What Makes “Accelerated” Payments Different Accelerated payments work differently—and this is where the real savings happen. With accelerated bi-weekly or accelerated weekly payments, you’re paying a slightly higher amount each time. That extra money goes directly toward reducing your mortgage principal, which lowers the interest you’ll pay over the life of the mortgage. A Simple Example Let’s assume a $1,000 monthly mortgage payment: Monthly: $1,000 once per month = $12,000 per year Semi-monthly: $500 twice per month = $12,000 per year Bi-weekly: $1,000 × 12 ÷ 26 = $461.54 every two weeks = $12,000 per year Accelerated bi-weekly: $1,000 ÷ 2 = $500 every two weeks = $13,000 per year With accelerated bi-weekly payments, you effectively make two extra payments per year without having to think about it. Those extra payments reduce your principal faster, which lowers interest costs over time. Accelerated weekly payments work the same way—you just make smaller payments more frequently. Why This Matters Long Term While it’s difficult to calculate exact savings due to variables like interest rates, terms, and amortization changes, maintaining an accelerated payment schedule over the life of your mortgage can reduce your amortization by up to three years and save a significant amount of interest. The Bottom Line Accelerated payments are a simple, automatic way to lower your overall cost of borrowing—without needing to make lump-sum payments or drastically change your budget. If you’d like to see how different payment frequencies would impact your mortgage specifically, feel free to reach out anytime. I’d be happy to walk through the numbers with you and help you choose the option that fits your goals.
© 2026 

Katherine Martin. All Rights Reserved.